Editorial
A New Attack on Health Care Reform
THE EDITORIAL BOARD
OCT. 20, 2015 - The New York Times
In recent months, several nonprofit
insurance plans that were created to compete with for-profit insurance plans
under the Affordable Care Act have run into financial
difficulties. Republicans and other critics of health care reform are
cynically pointing to their problems as evidence that the whole reform effort is
a waste of money that ought to be repealed.
They neglect to mention that the
nonprofit plans, known as health insurance cooperatives, were created as a weak,
underfunded alternative to a much stronger option that the Republicans blocked
from passage.
Back in 2009, while the reform law
was being debated in Congress, most Democrats were pushing for a so-called
public option, a government-run plan that consumers could choose as an
alternative to private insurance. Such a plan would not have to generate profits
and would have stronger bargaining powers to obtain discounts from health care
providers, enabling it to charge lower premiums than private plans.
When it became clear that no
public plan could survive a Republican filibuster, Senator Kent Conrad, a North
Dakota Democrat, proposed setting up these cooperatives to compete with the
profit-making plans. They, too, were presumed able to charge lower premiums
because they would not have to earn profits. The co-op provision was included in
the reform law enacted in March 2010.
Co-ops have been created in 23
states, enrolling more than a million people as of March 25. However, eight of
these co-ops — in Colorado, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, New York, Nevada,
Tennessee and Oregon — have announced this year that they are closing, and many
of the remaining co-ops are losing money, too.
Their problems have been
attributed to wrong estimates for how many people might enroll and to setting
premiums too low to cover the cost of care, as well as severe reductions in the
amount of money available to the co-ops from federal loans and for risk
adjustment payments, both the result of Republican opposition to supporting the
plans.
The overriding problem was the
difficulty in setting up the co-ops from scratch to compete against entrenched
insurance companies with deep pockets. Still, with capable management and
adequate funding, nonprofit cooperative plans can succeed for patients and
providers. Group
Health Cooperative, based in Seattle, has been in business for 70 years. It
provides coverage and care for around 600,000 people in Washington and
Idaho.
The co-op closures will mean that
hundreds of thousands of people covered by those plans will have to sign up with
other plans, probably with higher premiums.
Republicans and other critics have
been trying for four years to destroy health care reform. Three years ago the
Supreme Court rejected their efforts to declare the health care reform law
unconstitutional and this past June
it rejected their attempt to invalidate subsidies to help buy insurance on the
federal exchange used by most states.
Now they are after smaller game,
the co-ops. The Obama administration should see if there are ways to buttress
the remaining co-ops financially. Even if some of the co-ops close, their
enrollees will be able to find other sound health coverage thanks to the reform
law Republicans were unable to repeal.